Board OKs salary increase for Deegan
|
|
Before a standing room only crowd Monday night, the Bellevue Board of Education voted 5-1 to approve a 2 percent salary increase for Superintendent John Deegan.
The raise is part of a new three-year contract with an annual salary of $208,845 and an annuity of $45,000.
Board member Denise Seaman cited the salaries of other superintendents in the metropolitan area and said Deegan’s 13 years of experience, his leadership and knowledge make him worthy of the raise.
After the meeting, Deegan said he is "very happy" with the contract.
"It’s very significant for me and my family and the school district," he said.
Bellevue residents Kevin Comcowich, John Stewart and Cindy Copich all spoke against approving the new contract.
In her comments, Copich made reference to the district’s teachers rejecting a new contract proposal for the second time.
"When we elect school board members, what we hope to get for our vote is wise leadership," Copich said. "When you offer a contract to a superintendent, what we hope to get for our money is, again, wise leadership. Dr. Deegan leads this district - does a wise leader ask for his money first?"
Board member Nina Wolford voted against extending Deegan’s contract.
"The contract gives Dr. Deegan a total of $50,000 increase in a year when under the present offer, some of our teachers will make less than they made last year. I could not vote yes," Wolford said after the meeting. (Editor's Note: John Deegan's contract that was approved at the Nov. 2 Board of Education meeting calls for a 2 percent salary raise. The $45,000 annuity is not new to the contract, and is the same amount from his previous contract, according to school board member John Hansen.)
Along with Deegan’s contract, the board approved the management salary ranges for administrators, including assistant superintendents and principals. The total package is a 3.25 percent increase from last year.
Last week, the Bellevue Education Association, the teachers’ union, filed a petition with the Commission of Industrial Relations requesting mediation for contract negotiations.
The CIR is a state agency designed to resolve public sector labor controversies with jurisdiction over state and local government employees including public utilities, according to www.ncir.ne.gov.
In the first BEA vote, about three-quarters of the teachers rejected the contract. In the second vote, about 84 percent voted it down.
District officials said under both proposals, salary and benefits would increase by more than 4.5 percent from last year. Information provided to BEA members, however, said the package would increase by 4 percent, including an increase in base salary of 1 percent to $30,325.
| Should the City be recording your calls to City Hall? | Troutman says calls at City Hall recorded for security reasons |
Article Rating
Reader Comments
Disappointed in Board wrote on Nov 3, 2009 6:49 AM:
Bellevue Past wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:37 AM:
Meghan wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:37 AM:
I will sign wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:00 AM:
Husband of BPS teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:28 AM:
Disney Girl wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:48 AM:
reject wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:56 AM:
Respect wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:58 AM:
From inside the Classroom wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:50 AM:
Have no voice wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:52 AM:
UGH wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:52 AM:
RA wrote on Nov 3, 2009 10:17 AM:
You are incorrect in your statement "He took a 2% increase which is less than half of what is being offered to the teachers." That 2% is a pay increase of 2%. Two percent of his salary is a large increase (roughly $4170 a year), which is $348 and some change a month. In comparison, the teachers were offered a smidge over 1% salary increse ($325 a year on the base). That translates into $27 A MONTH increase, less taxes. The teachers package was 4.5, or 4.59 (still up for discussion). That is a TOTAL PACKAGE increase, which includes the 1% increase in the contribution the district had to make to NPERS because of the mandate from the state. The teachers also had to make a 1% increase as well, which constitutes a pay cut. On top of his 2%, he was also awarded an annuity of $45,000. Teachers do not have that in their package. Lets also throw in the car allowance and health care allowance and travel allowance, etc. Lets also look at the 3.5% increase in salary they gave administrators.
It surprises me that the BOE would even consider this. Are they not in tune with teachers or do they just continue to be pawns of the administration? I can compare this to a board to the north of Bellevue that is truly pawns of the administration. BOE's are elected by the public to ensure the administration is kept in check. If that is not the case, then they need to affect change. Automatic pay increases to administration, especially when the backbone of the education process is treated as second class citizens, is unconscionable. They (the BOE) is out of touch and needs to be replaced. They are more interested in getting trivial awards than leading your district.
I can say, with conviction, that I stood firm and did not allow that to happen in the district I am in. No adminstrators got any salary increase until the teacher's contract was settled. And no administrator got MORE THAN the teachers. WE understand WHO IS important. "
RA wrote on Nov 3, 2009 10:22 AM:
That can happen at any time, without any consequence to the BOE depending on the language of the contract. Recall is your option as a community. You elect the BOE and you can recall the BOE. It is probably the strongest message you can send to them at this time. Let them know they are not safe from consequences. "
Ex Teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 10:54 AM:
The fact that the out of touch Wackos in DC keep making Mandated, unfunded programs (No Child Left Behind) the responsibility of local schools, is not the fault of the Supt. Everytime you decide to require schools to act as the babysitter for the repsonsibilities that parents should be doing, it squeezes the purse tighter. To make the board or the Supt the fall guys on all of this is silly.
The State is going to reduce funding to schools, so where do you think the money will come from to pay anyone?Gov. Hienemann wrote a letter to NEA and BEA to get all you can, now he has backed off from that stupid comment, because he said it to get their support for re-election purposes.
Years ago, when I taught, we were getting 3 to 4% increases on a lot less base pay. When you let an uncontrolled Congress get involved by passing unfunded legislation, this is what you end up with.
Maybe Bellevue should consider going private. Parochial school teachers make Thousands less than Public school teachers, maybe there is a lesson in there. Remember, it was the BEA leadership who told members to reject the offer, not the board or Deegan. "
Taxpayer Speaks wrote on Nov 3, 2009 11:05 AM:
Perhaps the Teachers Union should fire their leaders who have failed them as well, as you are purporting that the BOE has failed the teachers, the BOE stands for the taxpayers and Nina Wolford, being a former teacher should understand that when she crosses the line to tell teacher Union leaders what they should be doing. Nina should go, as she is counter to her elected position for the taxpayer, plain and simple. "
Jenn Parent Class of 1999 BEHS wrote on Nov 3, 2009 11:43 AM:
To see Deegan be rewarded and line his pockets on the backs of the teachers he so blatantly dismisses, and to have a board member roll her eyes at Wolford for saying she supports the teachers is symptom of what has been happening on that board and with Deegan since I was at East 10 years ago.
I support all the BPS teachers - both those who taught me and those who were my classmates now working for BPS, and newest teachers in that district. They are the finest class of people, doing the hardest job with apparently now, the least reward.
I invite you, Dr. Deegan, to come down from your throne and teach for a month under the conditions you have created. You, too, Board of Education. Come out of your Welcome Center/Central Office Kingdom, and get back to educating children first hand. Go get in the trenches and spend a month in the classroom.
Spend more time each day and get paid less for it. Watch stimulus money get squandered as you struggle to afford healthcare that is by no means a "benefit".
Get out of your office Deegan, and stop trying to punish the students and teachers with your ego. And BOE, you are pawns, have been for years. Except for Walford, you are no Champions for Childrien.
Shinny buildings don't make a great school district. The teachers do. "
Bellevue Past wrote on Nov 3, 2009 12:14 PM:
To Bellevue Past wrote on Nov 3, 2009 1:43 PM:
The teachers did not get offered a 4.7% raise on their salary. It was a 1% salary bump and the remaining 3.7% was a figured that was calculated by using their current benefit payouts, it was not a % of their total comp...which really is the only fair way of stating things.
Please stop calling it a 4.7% package increase it is misleading to the public and a dishonest tatic to sway public opinion.
After sticking his foot in his mouth Degan should have just laid low and kept his comp the same as the previous year...by not doing this he has clearly indicated where his motives are. "
Former StudentCurrent Teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 2:15 PM:
First off thank you Ex Teacher and Bellevue Past, finally someone who is educated on how a military school district is run. Apples and oranges is certainly right. I ask you all to do a little research on how a school district let alone a military school district is run. Money is just not given to the district, Dr. Deegan has to go to DC and lobby and write legislature for the money. Dr. Deegan started out as teacher, then principal, then an assistant superintendent and finally superintendent. I know this because my brothers were students of his. He is being rewarded for his service to the district. As I recall those who obtain advance degrees and put the time and money into those advanced degrees will be rewarded as Dr. Deegan has been. The teachers that have been the most vocal leaders against the board and Dr. Deegan I ask you to make your salaries public. I guarentee that you have been rewarded for your time spent with your district in addition to your advanced degrees. While everyone is valuable those who are more valuble and have been around longer are paid more. That is common sense, and goes to be said with any company. Take a look at other area superintendents salaries/raises and you will see that Dr. Deegan sits in middle as far as pay goes. Just try and find one CEO that is paid even remotely close to one of his salesmen or one superintendent that is paid the same as one of his teachers. I'm a first year teacher/entry level employee and expect to be paid as that. While
I would love to be paid 60,000 starting out I just know that is not logical. I came to Bellevue knowing what I was going to be paid and what to expect. I'm currently working towards my master's degree, and when completed I expect to be rewarded. Educators please educate yourself. If you all think you can do a better job then get to working on aquiring what it takes to be a CEO/superintendent instead of pointing fingers.
Take a look around at the economy. People without jobs and no income, pay freezes, and cut backs. Times are tough. I thank God every night that I am fortunate enough to still have a job and a roof over my head. When the economy improves and pay raises are absent, then it is time to start the debate. No one becomes a teacher for the money, they do it for the love of teaching and the children. Stop pointing fingers, and get back to what is most important, the children. "
jimmy wrote on Nov 3, 2009 2:29 PM:
To Taxpayer speaks wrote on Nov 3, 2009 2:40 PM:
to Bellevue Past wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:34 PM:
Minds of their own wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:37 PM:
to Former StudentCurrent Teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:45 PM:
to Jenn Parent Class of 1999 BEHS wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:47 PM:
Get a Clue of Finances wrote on Nov 3, 2009 4:24 PM:
to Bellevue Past comment wrote on Nov 3, 2009 4:36 PM:
to Get a Clue of Finances wrote on Nov 3, 2009 4:58 PM:
Former StudentCurrent Teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 5:15 PM:
By educating yourself I meant take a look at other salaries/packages in this area and outside. We do not have it all that bad.
I agree completely(and I think everyone does) that teachers deserve to be paid more. I just don't believe now is the time to be lobbying for it when there is no money anywhere. Yes, the superintendent got a raise-he received the going rate. "
DISRESPECTED wrote on Nov 3, 2009 5:16 PM:
Dr. Deagan is ruthless and SELFISH!!!!!
The school board has no support towards the teachers.
As a teacher, I invite any school board member or Deagan to come be a teacher in my room for a week or so. None of you could handle it!! "
and another thought or two wrote on Nov 3, 2009 5:20 PM:
Above that, a clear line has been drawn in the proverbial sand. There are things being done and said out of spite. I am so proud of our BEA, as they have in the past weeks, and continue to conduct themselves with the utmost professionalism. Thank you BEA.
I would also like to say a personal thank you to Nina Wolford. You have put your neck out there on the line for us, and we notice, and we appreciate it.
Keep your chin up fellow teachers, we are on the right track. Stay strong and continue doing the outstanding professional job that you are doing. Let the other side fling all the stuff they want, we will continue to persevere for the kids. After all, it is why we all took this job from the beginning, right? "
7.5 more days of instructional time with no compensation wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:16 PM:
2. The BEA said nothing to me to sway me to vote one way or another. I am required to have 20 more minutes of instructional time with students each day equating to 7.5 extra days of work over the course of the year and 7.5 less days of time I can spend designing quality instructional activities, writing assessments, and grading those assessments. I can't offer to help students before or after school because there is now no time left in the contract day before school or after school. We have had 1 staff meeting all year because 10 minutes isn't even enough time to have a meeting, much less plan lessons, help students and grade papers.
3. We are all mindful of the economy. We know people are out of work or have taken a pay freeze or work less hours. For many of us, a simple 3% wage increase (not benefits increase even including the 1% additional contribution to retirement) would have been sufficient in this economy to thank us for working an additional 7.5 days (which we now do when planning from home or after hours at school.) With my additional course hours and experience, simply compensating me for the 20 minutes of extra contact time with students each day would equate to around $2,000. That's a far cry from the additional $300+ added to the base. My vote was simply me stating that I'm so very very tired of doing more with less. "
Shouldve Seen It Coming wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:26 PM:
RA wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:38 PM:
To compare a school district to a private sector company is truly showing your ignorance of the process. Companies are in the business to MAKE MONEY. That is why they pay their CEO's what they do. School districts have limited income that is given to them. They cannot invest it and they have to live withing their means. It is what it is. The largest amount of money spent in any district is salaries.
But who is there day in and day out on the front lines and what appreciation did the BOE and BEA show to them?
Dr. Deegan is not a CEO but a hired administrator by the public's voice (the Board of Education). The BOE is also responsible for the budget as well. It is pretty obvious they have no ability to budget or they would not have passed the administrator's increase before they had settled with the teachers. THAT would have been the right thing to do.
And unlike your comment about "His talents and expertise are more expensive than your talents and expertise". You have no idea who I am or what I do. My talents and expertise are not in question here. It is the actions of the school board and Dr. Deegan that are. I can tell you, FROM EXPERIENCE, that we did not allow our administrators to have their raises until our teacher's contract was settled. That shows our constituents where we value our employees.
And for you to spout off about teacher's parties and sick days and professional days? Are you counting the hours spent on professional development and classroom preparation and contacting parents and grading papers? They might be under a 187 day contract, but the "vacation" you all spout off about is taken up by preparing for the upcoming year, getting the mandatory classes required to keep their teaching certificate and attending professional development workshops, ALL ON THEIR OWN UNPAID TIME!
It is obvious you are either in denial or ignorant of what you are talking about. Why don't you do it for a week and see exactly how my time and talent it takes to deal with a classroom full of kids. "
RA wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:44 PM:
One last item before I start ignoring you....
You stated: "In these economic times a 4.7% raise in salary and benefits is much better than we are seeing in the real world where pay is being froze and jobs are being eliminated. Get a clue! "
I do agree. I had no raise last year. But is it fair to have all your upper management get a raise when the economy is in the tank and the state is planning on cutting funding? Maybe its you that should "Get a clue". "
To Former student current teacher wrote on Nov 3, 2009 10:07 PM:
to response to Bellevue past comment wrote on Nov 4, 2009 12:16 AM:
WOW wrote on Nov 4, 2009 12:50 AM:
Go Nina Wolford!! Funny thing is, she used to be a teacher. Apparently only teachers are smart enough to understand that he doesn't need even a 2% raise. Let's replace him with Nina!! "
TO ALL POSTERS but especially you nay-sayers wrote on Nov 4, 2009 6:59 AM:
I love to teach. I have been teaching in this district for about 15 years now. My children attend elementary school in this district. I know I am paid for 187 days. I know I work a bazillion hours of unpaid time, all in the name of trying to make kids critical thinkers in today's society. I know how rotten the economy is now. I know I am lucky to have a job.
I also know that when the first package came out, I saw that a bunch of teachers on that salary scale would lose money. I also know that I and every other teacher in THIS district ONLY are being asked to essentially work with students the equivalent of 8 more days this year....my sons teachers get 100 less minutes of planning time a week, and to an elementary teacher, that equates to A LOT of time lost. THAT was the INITIAL issue. If it had just stayed at that, NONE of this would be going on.
Dr. Deegan took it upon himself to put out a special issue of the EdNews, trying to manipulate teachers and make them feel guilty for voting NO...why would we do such a thing when we have it so wonderful??? He also took a monstrous poster-size version of that article to a high school where a BEA negotiator works. Then come the comments in the Bellevue Leader.
So, you see, Deegan has no one to blame but himself for this mess. He created it. If the process would have worked the way it was supposed to work, without Deegan's interference, comments, and publicity, I'm certain that this situation would not have taken the ugly turn that it has. And, he and others just keep making it worse. Could he not just immediately apologized for his comments? Could the Board not tell him he was a little out of line? Could they not at least put his raise on hold until the teacher contract was settled?
I love the Bellevue community and schools. The thought of going elsewhere just doesn't enter my mind. However, my passion for teaching has waned a bit in light of some of the negative comments of some of the posts here. Again, please just shut up. You are making the situation worse. Just shut up. "
Kevin Comcowich wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:47 AM:
Let's evaluate that a bit.
Do I have any political aspirations- NO.
Am I some kind of paid lobbyist- NO.
Have I injured personal friendships with some principals and other administrators in the district- YES.
Do I have better things to do than bird-dog the BOE- YES, I have a beautiful and energetic 2 1/2 year old that I would MUCH rather spend my time with.
Is my wife (a teacher in BPS) at risk because of my statements- YES.
Am I at risk because of my statements- YES, Dr. Deegan has significant personal connections in my field of employment.
Did I also fight HARD in support of Dr. Deegan and the BOE in their One City, One School District efforts- YES.
Do the math, would the potential for an extra one or two thousand dollars on my wife's paycheck (as opposed to $300) be worth that risk- NO.
I have done and said what I've said because I believe our children (yours, mine, and everyone’s) are the most important resource we have in this district, community, state, and nation.
It sickens me to think what the state of education will be in Bellevue in a few years simply because of the actions of this board and this administration.
Before you engage in ill-conceived hyperbole, perhaps you should investigate a bit of time in investigating the facts at hand. "
BPS patron wrote on Nov 4, 2009 12:09 PM:
Dr. Deegan - You were a teacher once. What would you have done if you were in the teacher's shoes?
BPS motto is CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN. As a previous poster said, "No one becomes a teacher for the money."
Everyone is hurting in this economy and it would do well for the rest of the BPS employees to see the administrators and BOE not to flaunt their lack of economic hardship. "
Quit then wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:01 PM:
to Quit Then wrote on Nov 4, 2009 3:07 PM:
As for "Going out in the real world and working twelve months a year" - People become teachers because they LOVE TEACHING. It's not their fault that the school calendar is the way it is. "
to Kevin Comcowich wrote on Nov 4, 2009 3:09 PM:
Your wife was one of my teachers. I am working toward an Education degree because of all of the wonderful teachers I had at BPS. "
Its not 2 its 23 wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:30 PM:
Again to Kevin Comcowish wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:39 PM:
I agree with you!!
I also had your wife as a teacher. Wonderful lady and she has influenced me to become a teacher.
There are some ruthless people on here!
Teachers only work 9 months....where sign me up. NOT!!! We put in more hours than you think. It is lost family time!! "
to Quit Then wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:55 PM:
Jill Comcowich wrote on Nov 4, 2009 6:44 PM:
To those criticizing my husband- he gains nothing from standing up for what he thinks is right, except thanks from many and some heartache and grief from a few. I'm proud of him and hope he always stands up for his beliefs. If you think the board is doing a great job, you are welcome to get yourselves on the agenda and to speak on behalf of YOUR beliefs. Hiding behind a blogname is a simple, spineless way to address the public.
Finally, I am truly sorry that the situation has gotten so negative. I used to brag about the wonderful relationship between the upper administration and the BEA. Hopefully, we can all grow and move on in a positive way, and we can all remember that giving respect is the best way to earn it. "
The big picture wrote on Nov 4, 2009 6:46 PM:
Here we sit, hundreds of teachers with hands in our laps, biting our lips, waiting for the right time to speak collectively. The problem is there is no way to do it safely. I say that because Dr. Deegan truly finds no fault in his words from earlier interviews. He speaks without regard for consequences because there have been none thus far. He firmly believes new buildings and buses are a better investment than teachers. He has not only slapped his teachers in their faces with blatant disrespect, he has insulted tax-paying community members by dictating when, where and how they can speak. A man who is unable to reflect on his behaviors, adjust them and find a balance between his perception and the community’s/teachers’ realities is an unreasonable man; one that operates solely on ego rather than rationale.
At the beginning of the year he celebrates the district’s high turnover rates during professional development and says that “if you don’t like it, just leave.” The problem is the interviewing process didn’t reveal the elephant in the room. We’re told from the beginning that we’re expendable and that our voices really aren’t welcome. But we come to work anyway because it’s impossible not to fall in love with our students, the diversity and the fact that we have an incredible student body. That’s why we stay.
I used to be comfortable going into my principal, talking to him about anything, believing he had my best interest at heart, but I also know he fears for his job and fear is a powerful motivator that will justify his “Yes Man” approach and result in him turning his back on his staff. I no longer knock on his door. I skip it and instead hurry to students waiting outside my classroom door for help. That’s why we stay.
I am passionate about what I do. I feel like I make a difference in my students’ lives. I know they make a difference in mine. I simply want to feel like my voice counts and that I can speak about concerns without fear of retribution. I want to be considered a team member even though I never want to be an administrator. The current hierarchy is poisonous and it’s time for change. Let’s do what’s right for the kids (because no one benefits from a hostile work environment) and begin the process of a recall. It’s not about the money any more as much as it is about ethics and simply fighting for what’s right. That’s why we stay. "
Teacher in the Minority wrote on Nov 4, 2009 7:38 PM:
Please demand the BEA leadership answer to the reality of what it means to take the case to CIR. If they have done their research and can then assure us there is nothing to lose, by all means continue the fight. If, however, there is no such assurance forthcoming, and going to CIR is a gamble with the benefits we do have, ask yourself if you are willing to take that gamble. Do not let this be about your anger towards Dr. Deegan’s words or actions nor your need to “prove a point” now that is has gone this far. Make very sure you are willing to “lose” as well as “win”. It is not too late to call for a revote or ask the leadership to settle in mediation before it goes to the CIR. A decision by the CIR is legally binding! "
Teacher in the Minority wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:28 PM:
Interesting... wrote on Nov 5, 2009 5:00 AM:
Since when wrote on Nov 5, 2009 7:04 AM:
Why So Much wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:08 AM:
john stewart wrote on Nov 5, 2009 12:05 PM:
To Teacher in the Minority wrote on Nov 5, 2009 1:31 PM:
Most of the benefits you cite are not actually IN the contract, and as such are neither protected, nor up for review by the CIR. They are board policies that could with a simple 5-1 vote be ended.
I encourage you to go to http://www.bellevuepublicschools.org click on the board of education link, and view the following board policies.
Policy 408.06- Voluntary Separation:
Certificated and/or employees placed on the salary schedules A, B, D, M, or N, upon written application
and approval by the Superintendent of Schools, may participate in a voluntary separation program. The
program will be reviewed annually for possible modification.
Policy 410.01 Annual Leave:
Accumulation
Days of leave, if not used, will accumulate from one year to the next. Employees with a balance of at
least 33 days will have an annual option for payment of the leave accumulation above seven days in that
year. Employees will be compensated annually for accumulated leave at the daily rate of pay for days in
excess of 110. Employees who have balances in excess of 120 days at the end of their 1989-90 contract will
have a choice of the following options: (a) payment for days in excess of 120 days at the current rate of
funding...
Policy 407.07 Longevity:
Each employee who has completed twenty (20) years of service with the district will receive recognition of
service in the amount of 3-3/4% of basic contract salary.
Policy 407.05 Salary Protection:
(AKA Long Term Disability)
The Bellevue Public Schools will provide a salary protection plan for all contracted professional staff
members with full premium to be paid by the school district. The program will be reviewed annually by the
Board of Education.
I am unable to find anything regarding the professional stipend in the board policies- I either missed it, or perhaps it actually is in the contract. "
I agrre with John wrote on Nov 5, 2009 2:14 PM:
Kathie Jacobson wrote on Nov 5, 2009 2:34 PM:
Lifes NOT Fair wrote on Nov 5, 2009 4:56 PM:
1. Life's not fair and actions speak infinitly louder than words.
2. Those who are given the power to self-serve will do so - look at the raise Dr. Deegan negotiated for himself.
3. The incumbent Board Members have over time become more connected with those they have regular contact with (i.e., Dr. Deegan et al) and less connected with those they have less contact with (i.e., teachers). Nina is not part of the collective... she is an independent thinker - but she's new and has yet to be won over by the "you will be assimilated resistance is futile" admin mantra... just joking of course... well sort of.
4. Media stories don't always put the most important parts of a story in the large bold-faced heading (e.g., the Bellevue Board of Education voted 5-1 to approve a 2 percent salary increase for Superintendent John Deegan.) When it should have instead emphasized the $45,000 annuity instead which is of course the most salient monetary aspect of the story.
5. Manipulation of facts and information designed to make Dr. Deegan and some of the board members look good will not go unnoticed... and will instead cause lasting wide-spread mistrust and resentment among staff and community members. The longer this goes on between staff and administration the more polarized staff and administration will become.
6. Some of the Board and Administration obviously don't think those of us out here are sophisticated enough to understand the politics and nuances of the current salary negotiation process as evidenced by the BPS newsletter.
7. When frustrated, please refer to item #1 above.
Note: This issue involves each and every community member. Our children/students are watching us "settle this thing" and learning future conduct skills from the example we set. Of course we all hope everyone will conduct themselves with decorum and integrity during the course of negotiations. Remember everyone, as educators we advocate for students' needs first... it's their needs, then our needs. If it's in the best interest of our students to give Dr. Deegan an extremely generous raise in lieu of the teachers at the grass roots level receiving one then that's the way it will be - primarily because Dr. Deegan has the power to make that happen and the rest of us don't. I said it before and I'll say it again, actions speak infinitely louder than words.
If you're looking for fault, it's not Dr. Deegan's fault... he's just negotiated the best deal for himself he can. If you're looking to blame the School Board members... it's not their fault, they were elected by popular vote. The truth is that if you disagree with the current state of affairs it's because we as individual community members (voters) allowed it to happen - we just stuck our heads in the sand content our elected board was taking care of things for us. Attempting to place blame on someone else for this situation is too simplistic... time for individual accountability in my humble opinion. If you don't like the situation it's going to require some effort on your part to rectify the situation --- probably more effort than simply casting a vote to oust the board member(s) you are blaming for the state of affairs. "
I wonder wrote on Nov 5, 2009 5:26 PM:
some thoughts wrote on Nov 5, 2009 7:57 PM:
More Thoughts wrote on Nov 5, 2009 9:45 PM:
just one of the help wrote on Nov 5, 2009 10:39 PM:
No Money wrote on Nov 6, 2009 6:07 AM:
To No Money wrote on Nov 6, 2009 9:21 AM:
RA wrote on Nov 6, 2009 10:34 AM:
Bellevue's contract is very thin in relationship to others in the learning community so upon review from the CIR, that will be looked at. Here is the deal with the CIR.
It would not be prudent for the BEA to go to the CIR unless a comparability study was done first. This gives them a picture of where they stand in the array. If they go to the full CIR without one, that is an extremely foolish maneuver. What they have requested is an arbitrator to come in and sit with the administration and BEA to work towards an agreement. If that fails, or is rejected by the BOE (which would be foolish on their part if they did not do a comparability study), that is when it will go before the full CIR.
Do teachers deserve more pay, HECK YES! We ask them to not only educate our children, but to also to be their nurse, mother/father, friend, mentor, babysitter and whatever else for the 7 hours they are in contact with your kids. On top of that we require them to continue in their own life long learning beyond the 20,000 dollars they spent to get that first piece of paper that declares them a teacher. How many of you would go four plus years, spend in excess of 20,000 dollars to get a job that pays you 2,000 a month (after taxes, benefits, retirement, union dues). On top of that, how many of you walk into your job at nine and leave at five and leave it all behind? Teachers walk into their job at 7 and usually don't leave it until 7 at night (sometimes later).
I am not a teacher, but I am married to one in BPS. She put it quite eloquently to me the other day in the amount of time she invests. Her comment was for the last three years, she has missed anything related to her own kids because of the time that is required to do what Bellevue demands the teachers do. Between the EOs and Terra Nova and required reading times and testing for this and that and that and working with students that would probably better served in a smaller classroom (inclusion) and professional development and collaboration, they have no time left. For the administration and the BOE to turn their backs on them is unconscionable. This is more that just the money. It is about respect. To give them a paltry 27 dollar a month increase in pay and two days off during the year (which there were blackout dates and restrictions) and to put more towards paying for their health insurance, which appears a majority does not use, is insulting.
The BOE and the BEA really messed this one up. For the BEA to not understand what their rank and file want to the BOE not settling with the teachers before paying off the administrators truly shows who runs the district. There is only one other BOE besides Bellevue that I think is weaker. It starts with an O...... "
Go teachers wrote on Nov 8, 2009 1:08 PM:
just one of the help wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:55 PM:
GIJeep wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:18 AM:
http://www.sarpy.com/election/election_2010.html
Anyone have any ideas as to the current members that fill those positions? "
TO GIJeep wrote on Nov 13, 2009 9:16 AM:


taxpayer wrote on Nov 3, 2009 6:44 AM: